Skip to content

Perth · Council

Swan

43,413 residential parcels covering 46.8 km².

Highly restricted land

≈74% of Swan’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Swan ranks #26 of 31 councils in Perth, and #91 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Swan. ABS LGA code 58050. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Swan ranks in Perth

Swan ranks #26 of 31 Perth-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Swan: ≈74% · rank #26 of 31

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Serpentine-Jarrahdale≈99%
  2. 2. Murray≈99%
  3. ⋯
  4. 24. Belmont≈78%
  5. 25. Victoria Park≈78%
  6. 26. Swan≈74%
  7. 27. Kwinana≈70%
  8. 28. South Perth≈70%
  9. ⋯
  10. 30. Vincent≈52%
  11. 31. Perth≈2%

Low-density

  1. 1. Mundaring≈94%
  2. 2. East Fremantle≈85%
  3. ⋯
  4. 26. Wanneroo≈26%
  5. 27. Victoria Park≈24%
  6. 28. Swan≈23%
  7. 29. Serpentine-Jarrahdale≈17%
  8. 30. Vincent≈6%
  9. 31. Perth≈2%

Heritage

  1. 1. Fremantle≈51%
  2. 2. East Fremantle≈31%
  3. ⋯
  4. 10. Mosman Park≈4%
  5. 11. Cambridge≈2%
  6. 12. Swan≈2%
  7. 13. Bassendean≈2%
  8. 14. Bayswater≈1%
  9. ⋯
  10. 30. Cockburn≈0%
  11. 31. Joondalup≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Serpentine-Jarrahdale≈99%
  2. 2. Murray≈99%
  3. ⋯
  4. 24. Rockingham≈79%
  5. 25. Victoria Park≈78%
  6. 26. Swan≈74%
  7. 27. Kwinana≈73%
  8. 28. South Perth≈70%
  9. ⋯
  10. 30. Vincent≈56%
  11. 31. Perth≈17%

Source: Swan ranked against other Perth-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Detailed zoning map

Swan’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon

Every residential zone in Swan

  1. Medium and high density residential (R25)——
  2. Residential<1 km²<0.1%
  3. Residential (R2)<1 km²<0.1%
  4. Residential (R2.5)<1 km²1.5%
  5. Residential (R5)1 km²2.2%
  6. Residential (R10)<1 km²0.7%
  7. Residential (R12.5)<1 km²1.1%
  8. Residential (R15)1 km²2.2%
  9. Residential (R17.5)1 km²1.9%
  10. Residential (R20)4 km²12.7%
  11. Residential (R25)<1 km²0.9%
  12. Residential development10 km²29.7%
  13. Residential development (R20)<1 km²<0.1%
  14. Residential redevelopment<1 km²0.7%
  15. Residential (R30)<1 km²1.0%
  16. Residential (R35)4 km²13.9%
  17. Development4 km²13.4%
  18. Residential (R40)2 km²5.3%
  19. Residential (R50)3 km²8.1%
  20. Midland strategic regional centre (R80)<1 km²0.2%
  21. Residential (R60)<1 km²1.4%
  22. Residential (R80)<1 km²1.2%
  23. Midland strategic regional centre (R100)<1 km²0.1%
  24. Residential (R100)<1 km²0.4%
  25. Midland strategic regional centre<1 km²1.2%
Per page:

Source: State-published zoning data, residential ex-rural, bounded to the Significant Urban Area. Areas measure the zone polygons drawn here, which include road reserve and unsubdivided land, so they are a different measure from the lot-by-lot areas behind this page’s restricted-land figures.