Victoria · VIC
Melbourne
Distances measured from Flinders Street Station.
Highly restricted land
≈45% of Melbourne’s residential land within 20km of Flinders Street Station is highly restricted.
Across the whole urban area, this rises to 50%.
Melbourne ranks #8 of 8 most restrictive Australian capitals. “Highly restricted” means residential land that is either zoned for no more than 2 storeys, designated low-density only, or covered by a heritage overlay.
Highly restricted, by distance from Flinders Street Station
2-storey cap
≈40%
Two-storey caps make dense development illegal.
Detached-only
≈2%
Only detached houses permitted—no townhouses or apartments.
Low-density only
≈36%
Low-density zoning typically only permits one or two dwellings per lot.
heritage controls
≈11%
Heritage restrictions often make redevelopment prohibitively difficult.
This is the geometric union of the four controls above. Controls overlap (for instance, a heritage block can also be zoned low-density), which is why the components don’t sum.
Highly restricted (total)
≈45%
Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls. Methodology →
Where Melbourne ranks across the country
Melbourne ranks #8 of 8 among Australian capitals for highly restrictive planning.
Highly restricted
Melbourne: ≈45% · rank #8 of 8
Highly restricted
- 1. Hobart ≈97%
- 2. Adelaide ≈92%
- 3. Darwin ≈88%
- 4. Perth ≈87%
- 5. Brisbane ≈86%
- 6. Sydney ≈81%
- 7. Canberra ≈74%
- 8. Melbourne ≈45%
2-storey cap
- 1. Hobart ≈97%
- 2. Adelaide ≈91%
- 3. Darwin ≈88%
- 4. Perth ≈86%
- 5. Brisbane ≈85%
- 6. Sydney ≈77%
- 7. Canberra ≈74%
- 8. Melbourne ≈40%
Low-density
- 1. Canberra ≈74%
- 2. Darwin ≈73%
- 3. Brisbane ≈73%
- 4. Sydney ≈69%
- 5. Perth ≈54%
- 6. Melbourne ≈36%
- 7. Adelaide ≈34%
- 8. Hobart ≈14%
Detached-only
- 1. Darwin ≈73%
- 2. Brisbane ≈66%
- 3. Sydney ≈3%
- 4. Melbourne ≈2%
- 5. Adelaide ≈0%
- 6. Canberra ≈0%
- 7. Hobart ≈0%
- 8. Perth ≈0%
Heritage
- 1. Sydney ≈13%
- 2. Melbourne ≈11%
- 3. Adelaide ≈9%
- 4. Hobart ≈3%
- 5. Perth ≈3%
- 6. Canberra ≈2%
- 7. Brisbane ≈1%
- 8. Darwin ≈0%
Permits no more than 2 storeys
≈40% of Melbourne’s residential land within 20km permits no more than 2 storeys.
Across the whole urban area, this rises to 47%.
Permits no more than 2 storeys, by distance
Across Melbourne’s residential land
Source: Melbourne parcels capped at no more than 2 storeys, against the all-housing-permitted denominator. Methodology →
What counts in Melbourne
Published height limit of ~2 storeys (≤ 8.5 m)
Zones: NRZ1, LDRZ, NRZ3, NRZ4, UGZ3, LDRZ2 (+33 more)
Low-density only
≈36% of Melbourne’s land within 20km is zoned for “low-density” within the planning scheme.
Across the whole urban area, this falls to 30%.
Low-density only, by distance
Across Melbourne’s residential land
Source: Melbourne parcels zoned for low-density residential use only. Methodology →
What counts in Melbourne
Zones: NRZ1, LDRZ, NRZ3, NRZ4, LDRZ2, NRZ5 (+9 more)
Detached houses only
≈2% of Melbourne’s residential land within 20km permits only detached houses.
Across the whole urban area, this rises to 9%.
Detached-houses-only zoning, by distance
Across Melbourne’s residential land
Source: Melbourne parcels permitting only detached dwellings, against the all-housing-permitted denominator. Methodology →
What counts in Melbourne
Zones: LDRZ, LDRZ2, LDRZ1, LDRZ3, LDRZ4
heritage controls
≈11% of Melbourne’s residential land within 20km is under heritage controls.
Across the whole urban area, this falls to 4%.
heritage controls, by distance
Across Melbourne’s residential land
Source: Melbourne residential parcels intersecting any state, local, or other heritage overlay. Methodology →
What counts in Melbourne
Controls: State Heritage, Local Heritage
Highly restricted land near rapid transit
≈40% of Melbourne’s residential land within 800m of rapid transit is highly restricted.
Within 800m of rapid transit
Source: Rapid-transit stops = train + tram + ferry stations plus any bus stop with mean headway ≤15 min across the weekday 7am-7pm GTFS window. Buffered 800m, intersected with the highly-restricted residential layer. Methodology →
Detailed zoning map
Melbourne’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon
Source: State-published zoning data. Excludes zones where residential uses are not typically permitted.
Local restrictiveness
Melbourne’s councils, ranked by restrictiveness.
- Yarra Ranges≈90%
- Boroondara≈86%
- Yarra≈84%
- Knox≈83%
- Glen Eira≈75%
- Manningham≈74%
- Kingston (Vic.)≈74%
- Hobsons Bay≈70%
- Mitchell≈69%
- Cardinia≈69%
- Bayside (Vic.)≈69%
- Nillumbik≈64%
- Melton≈60%
- Merri-bek≈59%
- Port Phillip≈56%
- Stonnington≈56%
- Brimbank≈52%
- Whitehorse≈50%
- Melbourne≈44%
- Hume≈44%
- Wyndham≈43%
- Maroondah≈43%
- Casey≈41%
- Banyule≈40%
- Whittlesea≈34%
- Monash≈30%
- Greater Dandenong≈27%
- Mornington Peninsula≈26%
- Frankston≈23%
- Maribyrnong≈17%
- Darebin≈11%
- Moonee Valley≈11%
Source: ABS 2025 LGA boundaries × union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls (parcel-level where available; zone-polygon for SA / ACT). Filtered to Melbourne LGAs with ≥1.5 km² of residential land.. Methodology →
Keep exploring
All Australian capitals
TAS
Hobart
≈97%
#1 of 8 · most to least restrictive
SA
Adelaide
≈92%
#2 of 8 · most to least restrictive
NT
Darwin
≈88%
#3 of 8 · most to least restrictive
WA
Perth
≈87%
#4 of 8 · most to least restrictive
QLD
Brisbane
≈86%
#5 of 8 · most to least restrictive
NSW
Sydney
≈81%
#6 of 8 · most to least restrictive
ACT
Canberra
≈74%
#7 of 8 · most to least restrictive
VIC
Melbourne
You are here
≈45%
#8 of 8 · most to least restrictive