Skip to content

Melbourne · Council

Casey

145,923 residential parcels covering 119.5 km².

Highly restricted land

≈41% of Casey’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Casey ranks #23 of 32 councils in Melbourne, and #122 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Casey. ABS LGA code 21610. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Casey ranks in Melbourne

Casey ranks #23 of 32 Melbourne-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Casey: ≈41% · rank #23 of 32

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges≈88%
  2. 2. Knox≈83%
  3. ⋯
  4. 18. Wyndham≈43%
  5. 19. Maroondah≈42%
  6. 20. Casey≈40%
  7. 21. Port Phillip≈40%
  8. 22. Banyule≈38%
  9. ⋯
  10. 31. Darebin≈7%
  11. 32. Moonee Valley≈0%

Low-density

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges≈88%
  2. 2. Knox≈83%
  3. ⋯
  4. 20. Mornington Peninsula≈25%
  5. 21. Frankston≈22%
  6. 22. Casey≈12%
  7. 23. Stonnington≈10%
  8. 24. Maribyrnong≈10%
  9. ⋯
  10. 31. Wyndham≈2%
  11. 32. Moonee Valley≈0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Yarra≈67%
  2. 2. Port Phillip≈49%
  3. ⋯
  4. 27. Kingston (Vic.)≈1%
  5. 28. Wyndham≈0%
  6. 29. Casey≈0%
  7. 30. Greater Dandenong≈0%
  8. 31. Knox≈0%
  9. 32. Mitchell≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges≈90%
  2. 2. Boroondara≈84%
  3. ⋯
  4. 21. Maroondah≈43%
  5. 22. Stonnington≈43%
  6. 23. Casey≈41%
  7. 24. Banyule≈40%
  8. 25. Whittlesea≈34%
  9. ⋯
  10. 31. Darebin≈11%
  11. 32. Moonee Valley≈11%

Source: Casey ranked against other Melbourne-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Casey

23 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Casey.

  1. Clyde North≈100%
  2. Cranbourne South≈100%
  3. Clyde (Vic.)≈99%
  4. Lysterfield South≈81%
  5. Narre Warren North≈76%
  6. Junction Village≈58%
  7. Cranbourne West≈57%
  8. Botanic Ridge≈55%
  9. Cranbourne East≈36%
  10. Berwick≈33%
  11. Narre Warren South≈32%
  12. Cranbourne North≈27%
  13. Endeavour Hills≈7%
  14. Hallam≈6%
  15. Cranbourne≈4%
  16. Tooradin≈2%
  17. Lyndhurst (Vic.)≈1%
  18. Eumemmerring≈1%
  19. Narre Warren≈0%
  20. Pearcedale≈0%
  21. Hampton Park≈0%
  22. Doveton≈0%
  23. Lynbrook≈0%
Per page:

All suburbs →

Melbourne context

Casey ranks #23 of 32 councils in Melbourne for highly restricted residential land.

  1. Yarra Ranges ≈90%
  2. Boroondara ≈84%
  3. Yarra ≈84%
  4. Knox ≈83%
  5. Manningham ≈74%
  6. Kingston (Vic.) ≈72%
  7. Hobsons Bay ≈70%
  8. Mitchell ≈69%
  9. Cardinia ≈69%
  10. Bayside (Vic.) ≈67%
  11. Nillumbik ≈64%
  12. Glen Eira ≈61%
  13. Melton ≈60%
  14. Merri-bek ≈59%
  15. Port Phillip ≈56%
  16. Brimbank ≈52%
  17. Whitehorse ≈49%
  18. Melbourne ≈44%
  19. Hume ≈44%
  20. Wyndham ≈43%
  21. Maroondah ≈43%
  22. Stonnington ≈43%
  23. Casey ≈41%
  24. Banyule ≈40%
  25. Whittlesea ≈34%
  26. Monash ≈28%
  27. Greater Dandenong ≈27%
  28. Mornington Peninsula ≈26%
  29. Frankston ≈23%
  30. Maribyrnong ≈17%
  31. Darebin ≈11%
  32. Moonee Valley ≈11%
Per page:

All councils →

Detailed zoning map

Casey’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon

Source: State-published zoning data. Excludes zones where residential uses are not typically permitted.

← Back to Melbourne