Skip to content

Melbourne · Council

Manningham

49,238 residential parcels covering 47.3 km².

Highly restricted land

≈74% of Manningham’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Manningham ranks #5 of 32 councils in Melbourne, and #92 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Manningham. ABS LGA code 24210. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Manningham ranks in Melbourne

Manningham ranks #5 of 32 Melbourne-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Manningham: ≈74% · rank #5 of 32

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges≈88%
  2. 2. Knox≈83%
  3. 3. Manningham≈73%
  4. 4. Kingston (Vic.)≈72%
  5. 5. Boroondara≈72%
  6. ⋯
  7. 31. Darebin≈7%
  8. 32. Moonee Valley≈0%

Low-density

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges≈88%
  2. 2. Knox≈83%
  3. ⋯
  4. 11. Brimbank≈52%
  5. 12. Whitehorse≈48%
  6. 13. Manningham≈45%
  7. 14. Maroondah≈42%
  8. 15. Port Phillip≈40%
  9. ⋯
  10. 31. Wyndham≈2%
  11. 32. Moonee Valley≈0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Yarra≈67%
  2. 2. Port Phillip≈49%
  3. ⋯
  4. 14. Yarra Ranges≈3%
  5. 15. Whitehorse≈2%
  6. 16. Manningham≈2%
  7. 17. Nillumbik≈2%
  8. 18. Brimbank≈2%
  9. ⋯
  10. 31. Knox≈0%
  11. 32. Mitchell≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges≈90%
  2. 2. Boroondara≈84%
  3. 3. Yarra≈84%
  4. 4. Knox≈83%
  5. 5. Manningham≈74%
  6. 6. Kingston (Vic.)≈72%
  7. 7. Hobsons Bay≈70%
  8. ⋯
  9. 31. Darebin≈11%
  10. 32. Moonee Valley≈11%

Source: Manningham ranked against other Melbourne-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Manningham

9 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Manningham.

  1. Park Orchards≈100%
  2. Warrandyte≈100%
  3. Templestowe Lower≈89%
  4. Wonga Park≈89%
  5. Donvale≈82%
  6. Bulleen≈81%
  7. Templestowe≈60%
  8. Doncaster≈54%
  9. Doncaster East≈48%
Per page:

All suburbs →

Melbourne context

Manningham ranks #5 of 32 councils in Melbourne for highly restricted residential land.

  1. Yarra Ranges ≈90%
  2. Boroondara ≈84%
  3. Yarra ≈84%
  4. Knox ≈83%
  5. Manningham ≈74%
  6. Kingston (Vic.) ≈72%
  7. Hobsons Bay ≈70%
  8. Mitchell ≈69%
  9. Cardinia ≈69%
  10. Bayside (Vic.) ≈67%
  11. Nillumbik ≈64%
  12. Glen Eira ≈61%
  13. Melton ≈60%
  14. Merri-bek ≈59%
  15. Port Phillip ≈56%
  16. Brimbank ≈52%
  17. Whitehorse ≈49%
  18. Melbourne ≈44%
  19. Hume ≈44%
  20. Wyndham ≈43%
  21. Maroondah ≈43%
  22. Stonnington ≈43%
  23. Casey ≈41%
  24. Banyule ≈40%
  25. Whittlesea ≈34%
  26. Monash ≈28%
  27. Greater Dandenong ≈27%
  28. Mornington Peninsula ≈26%
  29. Frankston ≈23%
  30. Maribyrnong ≈17%
  31. Darebin ≈11%
  32. Moonee Valley ≈11%
Per page:

All councils →

Detailed zoning map

Manningham’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon

Source: State-published zoning data. Excludes zones where residential uses are not typically permitted.

← Back to Melbourne