Skip to content

Melbourne · Council

Kingston (Vic.)

67,914 residential parcels covering 33.4 km².

Highly restricted land

74% of Kingston (Vic.)’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Kingston (Vic.) ranks #7 of 32 councils in Melbourne, and #95 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Kingston (Vic.). ABS LGA code 23430. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Kingston (Vic.) ranks in Melbourne

Kingston (Vic.) ranks #7 of 32 Melbourne-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Kingston (Vic.): 74% · rank #7 of 32

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges88%
  2. 2. Knox83%
  3. 3. Boroondara74%
  4. 4. Kingston (Vic.)73%
  5. 5. Manningham73%
  6. 6. Glen Eira72%
  7. 31. Darebin7%
  8. 32. Moonee Valley0%

Low-density

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges88%
  2. 2. Knox83%
  3. 3. Kingston (Vic.)73%
  4. 4. Glen Eira72%
  5. 5. Boroondara72%
  6. 31. Wyndham2%
  7. 32. Moonee Valley0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Yarra67%
  2. 2. Port Phillip49%
  3. 25. Cardinia1%
  4. 26. Whittlesea1%
  5. 27. Kingston (Vic.)1%
  6. 28. Wyndham0%
  7. 29. Casey0%
  8. 31. Knox0%
  9. 32. Mitchell0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Yarra Ranges90%
  2. 2. Boroondara86%
  3. 5. Glen Eira75%
  4. 6. Manningham74%
  5. 7. Kingston (Vic.)74%
  6. 8. Hobsons Bay70%
  7. 9. Mitchell69%
  8. 31. Darebin11%
  9. 32. Moonee Valley11%

Source: Kingston (Vic.) ranked against other Melbourne-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →