Skip to content

Canberra · Suburb

Downer

0 residential parcels covering 1.1 km².

Council: Unincorporated ACT

Highly restricted land

≈85% of Downer’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Downer ranks #41 of 96 suburbs in Canberra, and #1227 of 1,972 capital city suburbs nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Downer. ABS SAL code 80047. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Downer ranks in Canberra

Downer ranks #41 of 96 Canberra suburbs for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Downer: ≈85% · rank #41 of 96

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Banks≈100%
  2. 2. Dunlop≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 39. Fadden≈85%
  5. 40. Kambah≈85%
  6. 41. Downer≈85%
  7. 42. Fraser≈85%
  8. 43. Moncrieff≈84%
  9. ⋯
  10. 95. Franklin (ACT)≈0%
  11. 96. Greenway≈0%

Low-density

  1. 1. Banks≈100%
  2. 2. Dunlop≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 39. Fadden≈85%
  5. 40. Kambah≈85%
  6. 41. Downer≈85%
  7. 42. Fraser≈85%
  8. 43. Moncrieff≈84%
  9. ⋯
  10. 95. Franklin (ACT)≈0%
  11. 96. Greenway≈0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Forrest (ACT)≈68%
  2. 2. Red Hill (ACT)≈26%
  3. ⋯
  4. 34. Curtin≈0%
  5. 35. Denman Prospect≈0%
  6. 36. Downer≈0%
  7. 37. Duffy≈0%
  8. 38. Dunlop≈0%
  9. ⋯
  10. 95. Whitlam≈0%
  11. 96. Wright≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Banks≈100%
  2. 2. Dunlop≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 39. Fadden≈85%
  5. 40. Kambah≈85%
  6. 41. Downer≈85%
  7. 42. Fraser≈85%
  8. 43. Yarralumla≈84%
  9. ⋯
  10. 95. Franklin (ACT)≈0%
  11. 96. Greenway≈0%

Source: Downer ranked against other Canberra suburbs on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Canberra context

Downer ranks #41 of 96 suburbs in Canberra for highly restricted residential land.

Council:
  1. Banks ≈100%
  2. Dunlop ≈100%
  3. Ngunnawal ≈100%
  4. Nicholls ≈100%
  5. O’Malley ≈100%
  6. Oxley (ACT) ≈100%
  7. Palmerston (ACT) ≈100%
  8. Amaroo (ACT) ≈99%
  9. Ainslie ≈99%
  10. Higgins ≈96%
  11. Giralang ≈95%
  12. Crace ≈94%
  13. Richardson ≈94%
  14. Gordon (ACT) ≈93%
  15. Chapman ≈91%
  16. Calwell ≈90%
  17. Gowrie (ACT) ≈90%
  18. Rivett ≈89%
  19. Conder ≈89%
  20. Narrabundah ≈89%
  21. Chisholm (ACT) ≈89%
  22. Stirling (ACT) ≈89%
  23. Whitlam ≈88%
  24. Torrens ≈88%
  25. Red Hill (ACT) ≈88%
  26. Melba ≈88%
  27. Spence (ACT) ≈88%
  28. Watson ≈87%
  29. Farrer ≈87%
  30. Macgregor (ACT) ≈86%
  31. Campbell ≈86%
  32. Florey ≈86%
  33. Hawker (ACT) ≈86%
  34. Aranda ≈85%
  35. Evatt ≈85%
  36. Waramanga ≈85%
  37. Hackett ≈85%
  38. Isaacs ≈85%
  39. Fadden ≈85%
  40. Kambah ≈85%
  41. Downer ≈85%
  42. Fraser ≈85%
  43. Yarralumla ≈84%
  44. Moncrieff ≈84%
  45. McKellar ≈84%
  46. Duffy ≈84%
  47. Scullin ≈83%
  48. Bonython ≈83%
  49. O’Connor (ACT) ≈82%
  50. Hughes (ACT) ≈82%
  51. Isabella Plains ≈82%
  52. Theodore (ACT) ≈81%
  53. Wanniassa ≈81%
  54. Griffith (ACT) ≈81%
  55. Weston (ACT) ≈81%
  56. Monash (ACT) ≈81%
  57. Flynn (ACT) ≈81%
  58. Bonner ≈80%
  59. Latham (ACT) ≈79%
  60. Pearce ≈79%
  61. Gilmore (ACT) ≈77%
  62. Curtin ≈75%
  63. Kaleen ≈75%
  64. Cook ≈75%
  65. Denman Prospect ≈75%
  66. Fisher (ACT) ≈75%
  67. Garran ≈74%
  68. Casey ≈73%
  69. Charnwood ≈72%
  70. Holt ≈72%
  71. Lawson (ACT) ≈71%
  72. Holder (ACT) ≈71%
  73. Forrest (ACT) ≈69%
  74. Deakin ≈66%
  75. Wright ≈65%
  76. Weetangera ≈63%
  77. Chifley (ACT) ≈56%
  78. Mawson ≈55%
  79. Lyneham ≈54%
  80. Coombs ≈53%
  81. Lyons (ACT) ≈52%
  82. Turner ≈46%
  83. Forde ≈46%
  84. Macquarie ≈45%
  85. Taylor ≈36%
  86. Page ≈30%
  87. Braddon ≈28%
  88. Dickson ≈24%
  89. Harrison ≈19%
  90. Bruce (ACT) ≈18%
  91. Phillip ≈9%
  92. Kingston (ACT) ≈8%
  93. Gungahlin ≈6%
  94. Belconnen ≈0%
  95. Franklin (ACT) ≈0%
  96. Greenway ≈0%
Per page:

All suburbs →

← Back to Canberra ← Back to Unincorporated ACT