Highly restricted land

≈88% of Fannie Bay’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Fannie Bay ranks #24 of 30 suburbs in Darwin, and #1123 of 1,972 capital city suburbs nationally.

Highly restricted residential

Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Fannie Bay. ABS SAL code 70097. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Fannie Bay ranks in Darwin

Fannie Bay ranks #24 of 30 Darwin suburbs for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Fannie Bay: ≈88% · rank #24 of 30

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

1. Alawa≈100%
2. Anula≈100%
⋯
22. Millner≈93%
23. Driver≈92%
24. Fannie Bay≈88%
25. Johnston≈87%
26. Stuart Park≈86%
⋯
29. Coconut Grove≈80%
30. Darwin City≈2%

Low-density

1. Wulagi≈100%
2. Anula≈99%
⋯
24. Nightcliff≈62%
25. Johnston≈59%
26. Fannie Bay≈56%
27. Stuart Park≈53%
28. Coconut Grove≈30%
29. Zuccoli≈22%
30. Darwin City≈0%

Heritage

1. Alawa≈0%
2. Anula≈0%
⋯
7. Driver≈0%
8. Durack (NT)≈0%
9. Fannie Bay≈0%
10. Gray (NT)≈0%
11. Gunn≈0%
⋯
29. Wulagi≈0%
30. Zuccoli≈0%

Highly restricted

1. Alawa≈100%
2. Anula≈100%
⋯
22. Millner≈93%
23. Driver≈92%
24. Fannie Bay≈88%
25. Johnston≈87%
26. Stuart Park≈86%
⋯
29. Coconut Grove≈80%
30. Darwin City≈2%

Source: Fannie Bay ranked against other Darwin suburbs on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Darwin context

Fannie Bay ranks #24 of 30 suburbs in Darwin for highly restricted residential land.

Council:

Per page:

All suburbs →

← Back to Darwin ← Back to Darwin