Skip to content

Canberra · Suburb

Wanniassa

0 residential parcels covering 2.5 km².

Council: Unincorporated ACT

Highly restricted land

81% of Wanniassa’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Wanniassa ranks #53 of 96 suburbs in Canberra, and #1321 of 1,972 capital city suburbs nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Wanniassa. ABS SAL code 80129. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Wanniassa ranks in Canberra

Wanniassa ranks #53 of 96 Canberra suburbs for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Wanniassa: 81% · rank #53 of 96

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Banks100%
  2. 2. Dunlop100%
  3. 51. Isabella Plains82%
  4. 52. Theodore (ACT)81%
  5. 53. Wanniassa81%
  6. 54. Weston (ACT)81%
  7. 55. Monash (ACT)81%
  8. 95. Franklin (ACT)0%
  9. 96. Greenway0%

Low-density

  1. 1. Banks100%
  2. 2. Dunlop100%
  3. 51. Isabella Plains82%
  4. 52. Theodore (ACT)81%
  5. 53. Wanniassa81%
  6. 54. Weston (ACT)81%
  7. 55. Monash (ACT)81%
  8. 95. Franklin (ACT)0%
  9. 96. Greenway0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Forrest (ACT)68%
  2. 2. Red Hill (ACT)26%
  3. 88. Theodore (ACT)0%
  4. 89. Torrens0%
  5. 90. Wanniassa0%
  6. 91. Waramanga0%
  7. 92. Watson0%
  8. 95. Whitlam0%
  9. 96. Wright0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Banks100%
  2. 2. Dunlop100%
  3. 51. Isabella Plains82%
  4. 52. Theodore (ACT)81%
  5. 53. Wanniassa81%
  6. 54. Griffith (ACT)81%
  7. 55. Weston (ACT)81%
  8. 95. Franklin (ACT)0%
  9. 96. Greenway0%

Source: Wanniassa ranked against other Canberra suburbs on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Canberra context

Wanniassa ranks #53 of 96 suburbs in Canberra for highly restricted residential land.

Council:
  1. Banks 100%
  2. Dunlop 100%
  3. Ngunnawal 100%
  4. Nicholls 100%
  5. O’Malley 100%
  6. Oxley (ACT) 100%
  7. Palmerston (ACT) 100%
  8. Amaroo (ACT) 99%
  9. Ainslie 99%
  10. Higgins 96%
  11. Giralang 95%
  12. Crace 94%
  13. Richardson 94%
  14. Gordon (ACT) 93%
  15. Chapman 91%
  16. Calwell 90%
  17. Gowrie (ACT) 90%
  18. Rivett 89%
  19. Conder 89%
  20. Narrabundah 89%
  21. Chisholm (ACT) 89%
  22. Stirling (ACT) 89%
  23. Whitlam 88%
  24. Torrens 88%
  25. Red Hill (ACT) 88%
  26. Melba 88%
  27. Spence (ACT) 88%
  28. Watson 87%
  29. Farrer 87%
  30. Macgregor (ACT) 86%
  31. Campbell 86%
  32. Florey 86%
  33. Hawker (ACT) 86%
  34. Aranda 85%
  35. Evatt 85%
  36. Waramanga 85%
  37. Hackett 85%
  38. Isaacs 85%
  39. Fadden 85%
  40. Kambah 85%
  41. Downer 85%
  42. Fraser 85%
  43. Yarralumla 84%
  44. Moncrieff 84%
  45. McKellar 84%
  46. Duffy 84%
  47. Scullin 83%
  48. Bonython 83%
  49. O’Connor (ACT) 82%
  50. Hughes (ACT) 82%
  51. Isabella Plains 82%
  52. Theodore (ACT) 81%
  53. Wanniassa 81%
  54. Griffith (ACT) 81%
  55. Weston (ACT) 81%
  56. Monash (ACT) 81%
  57. Flynn (ACT) 81%
  58. Bonner 80%
  59. Latham (ACT) 79%
  60. Pearce 79%
  61. Gilmore (ACT) 77%
  62. Curtin 75%
  63. Kaleen 75%
  64. Cook 75%
  65. Denman Prospect 75%
  66. Fisher (ACT) 75%
  67. Garran 74%
  68. Casey 73%
  69. Charnwood 72%
  70. Holt 72%
  71. Lawson (ACT) 71%
  72. Holder (ACT) 71%
  73. Forrest (ACT) 69%
  74. Deakin 66%
  75. Wright 65%
  76. Weetangera 63%
  77. Chifley (ACT) 56%
  78. Mawson 55%
  79. Lyneham 54%
  80. Coombs 53%
  81. Lyons (ACT) 52%
  82. Turner 46%
  83. Forde 46%
  84. Macquarie 45%
  85. Taylor 36%
  86. Page 30%
  87. Braddon 28%
  88. Dickson 24%
  89. Harrison 19%
  90. Bruce (ACT) 18%
  91. Phillip 9%
  92. Kingston (ACT) 8%
  93. Gungahlin 6%
  94. Belconnen 0%
  95. Franklin (ACT) 0%
  96. Greenway 0%
Per page:

All suburbs →