Highly restricted land
≈68% of Throsby’s residential land is highly restricted.
Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps.
- Highly restricted residential
- Not highly restricted residential
Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Throsby. ABS SAL code 80125. Methodology
Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.
Canberra context
Canberra’s suburbs, ranked by highly restricted residential land.
Council:
- Banks Restricted: ≈100%
- Dunlop Restricted: ≈100%
- Ngunnawal Restricted: ≈100%
- Nicholls Restricted: ≈100%
- O’Malley Restricted: ≈100%
- Oxley (ACT) Restricted: ≈100%
- Palmerston (ACT) Restricted: ≈100%
- Amaroo (ACT) Restricted: ≈99%
- Ainslie Restricted: ≈99%
- Higgins Restricted: ≈96%
- Giralang Restricted: ≈95%
- Crace Restricted: ≈94%
- Richardson Restricted: ≈94%
- Gordon (ACT) Restricted: ≈93%
- Chapman Restricted: ≈91%
- Calwell Restricted: ≈90%
- Gowrie (ACT) Restricted: ≈90%
- Rivett Restricted: ≈89%
- Conder Restricted: ≈89%
- Narrabundah Restricted: ≈89%
- Chisholm (ACT) Restricted: ≈89%
- Stirling (ACT) Restricted: ≈89%
- Whitlam Restricted: ≈88%
- Torrens Restricted: ≈88%
- Red Hill (ACT) Restricted: ≈88%
- Melba Restricted: ≈88%
- Spence (ACT) Restricted: ≈88%
- Farrer Restricted: ≈87%
- Campbell Restricted: ≈87%
- Macgregor (ACT) Restricted: ≈86%
- Florey Restricted: ≈86%
- Hawker (ACT) Restricted: ≈86%
- Aranda Restricted: ≈85%
- Evatt Restricted: ≈85%
- Waramanga Restricted: ≈85%
- Hackett Restricted: ≈85%
- Isaacs Restricted: ≈85%
- Fadden Restricted: ≈85%
- Kambah Restricted: ≈85%
- Downer Restricted: ≈85%
- Fraser Restricted: ≈85%
- Yarralumla Restricted: ≈84%
- Moncrieff Restricted: ≈84%
- McKellar Restricted: ≈84%
- Duffy Restricted: ≈84%
- Scullin Restricted: ≈83%
- Bonython Restricted: ≈83%
- O’Connor (ACT) Restricted: ≈82%
- Hughes (ACT) Restricted: ≈82%
- Isabella Plains Restricted: ≈82%
- Watson Restricted: ≈82%
- Theodore (ACT) Restricted: ≈81%
- Wanniassa Restricted: ≈81%
- Griffith (ACT) Restricted: ≈81%
- Weston (ACT) Restricted: ≈81%
- Monash (ACT) Restricted: ≈81%
- Flynn (ACT) Restricted: ≈81%
- Bonner Restricted: ≈80%
- Latham (ACT) Restricted: ≈79%
- Pearce Restricted: ≈79%
- Gilmore (ACT) Restricted: ≈77%
- Denman Prospect Restricted: ≈75%
- Curtin Restricted: ≈75%
- Kaleen Restricted: ≈75%
- Cook Restricted: ≈75%
- Fisher (ACT) Restricted: ≈75%
- Garran Restricted: ≈74%
- Casey Restricted: ≈73%
- Charnwood Restricted: ≈72%
- Holt Restricted: ≈72%
- Lawson (ACT) Restricted: ≈71%
- Holder (ACT) Restricted: ≈71%
- Forrest (ACT) Restricted: ≈67%
- Deakin Restricted: ≈66%
- Wright Restricted: ≈65%
- Weetangera Restricted: ≈63%
- Chifley (ACT) Restricted: ≈56%
- Mawson Restricted: ≈55%
- Lyneham Restricted: ≈54%
- Coombs Restricted: ≈53%
- Lyons (ACT) Restricted: ≈52%
- Turner Restricted: ≈46%
- Forde Restricted: ≈46%
- Macquarie Restricted: ≈45%
- Taylor Restricted: ≈36%
- Page Restricted: ≈30%
- Braddon Restricted: ≈28%
- Dickson Restricted: ≈24%
- Harrison Restricted: ≈19%
- Bruce (ACT) Restricted: ≈18%
- Phillip Restricted: ≈9%
- Kingston (ACT) Restricted: ≈8%
- Gungahlin Restricted: ≈6%
- Belconnen Restricted: ≈0%
- Franklin (ACT) Restricted: ≈0%
- Greenway Restricted: ≈0%
No matching items.
Detailed zoning map
Throsby’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon
Loading map…
Every residential zone in Throsby
- Suburban RZ1 <1 km² 67.5%
- Urban Residential RZ3 <1 km² 29.9%
- Mixed Use CZ5 <1 km² 2.5%
No matching items.
Source: State-published zoning data, residential ex-rural, bounded to the Significant Urban Area. Areas measure the zone polygons drawn here, which include road reserve and unsubdivided land, so they are a different measure from the lot-by-lot areas behind this page’s restricted-land figures.