Highly restricted land
≈100% of Archer’s residential land is highly restricted.
Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps.
Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential
Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Archer. ABS SAL code 70016. Methodology →
Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.
Darwin context
Darwin’s suburbs, ranked by highly restricted residential land.
Council:
- Alawa ≈100%
- Anula ≈100%
- Bellamack ≈100%
- Jingili ≈100%
- Leanyer ≈100%
- Lyons (NT) ≈100%
- Wulagi ≈100%
- Moil ≈100%
- Malak ≈98%
- Durack (NT) ≈98%
- Zuccoli ≈98%
- Nakara ≈98%
- Wanguri ≈97%
- Rosebery (NT) ≈97%
- Karama ≈97%
- Woodroffe ≈96%
- Tiwi ≈96%
- Bakewell ≈96%
- Moulden ≈95%
- Gunn ≈95%
- Gray (NT) ≈95%
- Millner ≈93%
- Driver ≈92%
- Fannie Bay ≈88%
- Johnston ≈87%
- Stuart Park ≈86%
- Rapid Creek ≈85%
- Nightcliff ≈85%
- Coconut Grove ≈80%
- Darwin City ≈2%
Per page:
Detailed zoning map
Archer’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon
Source: State-published zoning data, residential ex-rural, bounded to the Significant Urban Area. Areas measure the zone polygons drawn here, which include road reserve and unsubdivided land, so they are a different measure from the lot-by-lot areas behind this page’s restricted-land figures.