Highly restricted land
≈81% of Canterbury-Bankstown’s residential land is highly restricted.
Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Canterbury-Bankstown ranks #20 of 33 councils in Sydney, and #77 of 133 capital city councils nationally.
Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Canterbury-Bankstown. ABS LGA code 11570. Methodology →
Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.
Where Canterbury-Bankstown ranks in Sydney
Canterbury-Bankstown ranks #20 of 33 Sydney-area councils for highly restricted residential land.
Highly restricted
Canterbury-Bankstown: ≈81% · rank #20 of 33
2-storey cap
- 1. Wollondilly≈100%
- 2. Blue Mountains≈100%
- ⋯
- 14. Willoughby≈84%
- 15. Ryde≈81%
- 16. Canterbury-Bankstown≈80%
- 17. Lane Cove≈80%
- 18. Cumberland≈80%
- ⋯
- 32. North Sydney≈53%
- 33. Sydney≈33%
Low-density
- 1. Blue Mountains≈98%
- 2. Wollondilly≈97%
- ⋯
- 22. Mosman≈66%
- 23. Bayside (NSW)≈63%
- 24. Canterbury-Bankstown≈61%
- 25. Woollahra≈60%
- 26. Camden≈59%
- ⋯
- 32. North Sydney≈42%
- 33. Sydney≈5%
Heritage
- 1. Hunters Hill≈58%
- 2. Sydney≈54%
- ⋯
- 23. Wollondilly≈2%
- 24. Northern Beaches≈2%
- 25. Canterbury-Bankstown≈2%
- 26. The Hills≈1%
- 27. Liverpool≈1%
- ⋯
- 32. Blacktown≈1%
- 33. Blue Mountains≈0%
Highly restricted
- 1. Wollondilly≈100%
- 2. Blue Mountains≈100%
- ⋯
- 18. Mosman≈81%
- 19. Cumberland≈81%
- 20. Canterbury-Bankstown≈81%
- 21. Lane Cove≈81%
- 22. Strathfield≈80%
- ⋯
- 32. Sydney≈62%
- 33. North Sydney≈59%
Source: Canterbury-Bankstown ranked against other Sydney-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →
Suburbs in Canterbury-Bankstown
33 suburbs sit inside this council.
ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Canterbury-Bankstown.
- Picnic Point≈100%
- Padstow Heights≈100%
- Milperra≈99%
- Revesby Heights≈99%
- Condell Park≈99%
- Georges Hall≈99%
- Earlwood≈98%
- Belfield≈96%
- Croydon Park (NSW)≈96%
- Ashbury≈95%
- Panania≈95%
- Bass Hill≈94%
- Kingsgrove≈93%
- Greenacre≈92%
- Roselands≈92%
- Revesby≈91%
- East Hills≈90%
- Sefton≈88%
- Hurlstone Park≈86%
- Padstow≈86%
- Chester Hill≈86%
- Villawood≈85%
- Yagoona≈85%
- Birrong≈83%
- Narwee≈77%
- Canterbury (NSW)≈67%
- Punchbowl (Canterbury-Bankstown - NSW)≈59%
- Belmore≈57%
- Bankstown≈56%
- Riverwood≈52%
- Campsie≈46%
- Wiley Park≈30%
- Lakemba≈28%
Sydney context
Canterbury-Bankstown ranks #20 of 33 councils in Sydney for highly restricted residential land.
- Wollondilly ≈100%
- Blue Mountains ≈100%
- Hawkesbury ≈98%
- Hornsby ≈96%
- Hunters Hill ≈94%
- Northern Beaches ≈94%
- Ku-ring-gai ≈93%
- Campbelltown (NSW) ≈92%
- Blacktown ≈90%
- Penrith ≈88%
- Fairfield ≈88%
- Georges River ≈87%
- Ryde ≈87%
- Sutherland ≈86%
- Willoughby ≈86%
- The Hills ≈85%
- Burwood ≈82%
- Mosman ≈81%
- Cumberland ≈81%
- Canterbury-Bankstown ≈81%
- Lane Cove ≈81%
- Strathfield ≈80%
- Inner West ≈78%
- Parramatta ≈78%
- Woollahra ≈77%
- Waverley ≈76%
- Liverpool ≈75%
- Bayside (NSW) ≈75%
- Randwick ≈75%
- Camden ≈74%
- Canada Bay ≈70%
- Sydney ≈62%
- North Sydney ≈59%
Detailed zoning map
Canterbury-Bankstown’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon
Source: State-published zoning data. Excludes zones where residential uses are not typically permitted.