Skip to content

Sydney · Council

Northern Beaches

64,568 residential parcels covering 50.3 km².

Highly restricted land

94% of Northern Beaches’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Northern Beaches ranks #6 of 33 councils in Sydney, and #31 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Northern Beaches. ABS LGA code 15990. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Northern Beaches ranks in Sydney

Northern Beaches ranks #6 of 33 Sydney-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Northern Beaches: 94% · rank #6 of 33

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Wollondilly100%
  2. 2. Blue Mountains100%
  3. 3. Hawkesbury97%
  4. 4. Northern Beaches93%
  5. 5. Hornsby93%
  6. 6. Hunters Hill93%
  7. 32. North Sydney54%
  8. 33. Sydney33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Blue Mountains98%
  2. 2. Wollondilly97%
  3. 5. Hawkesbury88%
  4. 6. Hunters Hill87%
  5. 7. Northern Beaches86%
  6. 8. Georges River85%
  7. 9. Blacktown85%
  8. 32. North Sydney42%
  9. 33. Sydney5%

Heritage

  1. 1. Hunters Hill58%
  2. 2. Sydney54%
  3. 22. Cumberland3%
  4. 23. Wollondilly2%
  5. 24. Northern Beaches2%
  6. 25. Canterbury-Bankstown2%
  7. 26. The Hills1%
  8. 32. Blacktown1%
  9. 33. Blue Mountains0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Wollondilly100%
  2. 2. Blue Mountains100%
  3. 4. Hornsby96%
  4. 5. Hunters Hill94%
  5. 6. Northern Beaches94%
  6. 7. Ku-ring-gai93%
  7. 8. Campbelltown (NSW)92%
  8. 32. Sydney62%
  9. 33. North Sydney59%

Source: Northern Beaches ranked against other Sydney-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →