Skip to content

Sydney · Council

Ku-ring-gai

33,692 residential parcels covering 37.6 km².

Highly restricted land

93% of Ku-ring-gai’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Ku-ring-gai ranks #7 of 33 councils in Sydney, and #34 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Ku-ring-gai. ABS LGA code 14500. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Ku-ring-gai ranks in Sydney

Ku-ring-gai ranks #7 of 33 Sydney-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Ku-ring-gai: 93% · rank #7 of 33

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Wollondilly100%
  2. 2. Blue Mountains100%
  3. 6. Hunters Hill93%
  4. 7. Campbelltown (NSW)92%
  5. 8. Ku-ring-gai92%
  6. 9. Blacktown89%
  7. 10. Fairfield87%
  8. 32. North Sydney54%
  9. 33. Sydney33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Blue Mountains98%
  2. 2. Wollondilly97%
  3. 3. Hornsby95%
  4. 4. Ku-ring-gai92%
  5. 5. Hawkesbury88%
  6. 6. Hunters Hill87%
  7. 32. North Sydney42%
  8. 33. Sydney5%

Heritage

  1. 1. Hunters Hill58%
  2. 2. Sydney54%
  3. 8. Mosman23%
  4. 9. Waverley19%
  5. 10. Ku-ring-gai15%
  6. 11. Hornsby15%
  7. 12. Strathfield13%
  8. 32. Blacktown1%
  9. 33. Blue Mountains0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Wollondilly100%
  2. 2. Blue Mountains100%
  3. 5. Hunters Hill94%
  4. 6. Northern Beaches94%
  5. 7. Ku-ring-gai93%
  6. 8. Campbelltown (NSW)92%
  7. 9. Blacktown90%
  8. 32. Sydney62%
  9. 33. North Sydney59%

Source: Ku-ring-gai ranked against other Sydney-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →