Skip to content

Sydney · Council

Liverpool

66,033 residential parcels covering 60.1 km².

Highly restricted land

≈75% of Liverpool’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Liverpool ranks #27 of 33 councils in Sydney, and #88 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Liverpool. ABS LGA code 14900. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Liverpool ranks in Sydney

Liverpool ranks #27 of 33 Sydney-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Liverpool: ≈75% · rank #27 of 33

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Wollondilly≈100%
  2. 2. Blue Mountains≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 23. Bayside (NSW)≈74%
  5. 24. Camden≈73%
  6. 25. Liverpool≈73%
  7. 26. Waverley≈71%
  8. 27. Randwick≈71%
  9. ⋯
  10. 32. North Sydney≈53%
  11. 33. Sydney≈33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Blue Mountains≈98%
  2. 2. Wollondilly≈97%
  3. ⋯
  4. 28. Randwick≈58%
  5. 29. Waverley≈54%
  6. 30. Liverpool≈53%
  7. 31. Inner West≈52%
  8. 32. North Sydney≈42%
  9. 33. Sydney≈5%

Heritage

  1. 1. Hunters Hill≈58%
  2. 2. Sydney≈54%
  3. ⋯
  4. 25. Canterbury-Bankstown≈2%
  5. 26. The Hills≈1%
  6. 27. Liverpool≈1%
  7. 28. Penrith≈1%
  8. 29. Sutherland≈1%
  9. ⋯
  10. 32. Blacktown≈1%
  11. 33. Blue Mountains≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Wollondilly≈100%
  2. 2. Blue Mountains≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 25. Woollahra≈77%
  5. 26. Waverley≈76%
  6. 27. Liverpool≈75%
  7. 28. Bayside (NSW)≈75%
  8. 29. Randwick≈75%
  9. ⋯
  10. 32. Sydney≈62%
  11. 33. North Sydney≈59%

Source: Liverpool ranked against other Sydney-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Liverpool

31 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Liverpool.

  1. Elizabeth Hills≈100%
  2. Horningsea Park≈100%
  3. Pleasure Point≈100%
  4. Voyager Point≈100%
  5. West Hoxton≈100%
  6. Heckenberg≈99%
  7. Hammondville≈99%
  8. Cecil Hills≈99%
  9. Prestons≈99%
  10. Hoxton Park≈98%
  11. Denham Court≈98%
  12. Hinchinbrook (NSW)≈98%
  13. Wattle Grove (NSW)≈97%
  14. Lurnea≈96%
  15. Chipping Norton≈96%
  16. Middleton Grange≈94%
  17. Green Valley (NSW)≈94%
  18. Busby≈94%
  19. Moorebank≈93%
  20. Ashcroft≈91%
  21. Sadleir≈91%
  22. Casula≈90%
  23. Carnes Hill≈86%
  24. Austral≈83%
  25. Warwick Farm≈74%
  26. Cartwright≈59%
  27. Liverpool≈58%
  28. Edmondson Park≈47%
  29. Miller≈44%
  30. Luddenham≈29%
  31. Bringelly≈21%
Per page:

All suburbs →

Sydney context

Liverpool ranks #27 of 33 councils in Sydney for highly restricted residential land.

  1. Wollondilly ≈100%
  2. Blue Mountains ≈100%
  3. Hawkesbury ≈98%
  4. Hornsby ≈96%
  5. Hunters Hill ≈94%
  6. Northern Beaches ≈94%
  7. Ku-ring-gai ≈93%
  8. Campbelltown (NSW) ≈92%
  9. Blacktown ≈90%
  10. Penrith ≈88%
  11. Fairfield ≈88%
  12. Georges River ≈87%
  13. Ryde ≈87%
  14. Sutherland ≈86%
  15. Willoughby ≈86%
  16. The Hills ≈85%
  17. Burwood ≈82%
  18. Mosman ≈81%
  19. Cumberland ≈81%
  20. Canterbury-Bankstown ≈81%
  21. Lane Cove ≈81%
  22. Strathfield ≈80%
  23. Inner West ≈78%
  24. Parramatta ≈78%
  25. Woollahra ≈77%
  26. Waverley ≈76%
  27. Liverpool ≈75%
  28. Bayside (NSW) ≈75%
  29. Randwick ≈75%
  30. Camden ≈74%
  31. Canada Bay ≈70%
  32. Sydney ≈62%
  33. North Sydney ≈59%
Per page:

All councils →

Detailed zoning map

Liverpool’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon

Source: State-published zoning data. Excludes zones where residential uses are not typically permitted.

← Back to Sydney