Highly restricted land
≈0% of Barossa’s residential land is highly restricted.
No single restriction type dominates.
Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential
Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Barossa. ABS LGA code 40310. Methodology →
Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.
Adelaide context
Adelaide’s councils, ranked by highly restricted residential land.
- Adelaide Hills ≈100%
- Adelaide Plains ≈100%
- Burnside ≈98%
- Mitcham ≈98%
- Campbelltown (SA) ≈95%
- Holdfast Bay ≈94%
- Charles Sturt ≈94%
- Tea Tree Gully ≈94%
- Walkerville ≈93%
- Unley ≈92%
- Norwood Payneham and St Peters ≈92%
- Salisbury ≈92%
- Port Adelaide Enfield ≈91%
- Marion ≈87%
- Prospect ≈85%
- Onkaparinga ≈85%
- Gawler ≈83%
- West Torrens ≈81%
- Light ≈76%
- Mount Barker ≈72%
- Playford ≈67%
- Adelaide ≈44%
Per page:
Detailed zoning map
Barossa’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon
Every residential zone in Barossa
- NeighbourhoodN<1 km²1.3%
- General NeighbourhoodGN<1 km²1.3%
- Master Planned NeighbourhoodMPN<1 km²97.4%
Per page:
Source: State-published zoning data, residential ex-rural, bounded to the Significant Urban Area. Areas measure the zone polygons drawn here, which include road reserve and unsubdivided land, so they are a different measure from the lot-by-lot areas behind this page’s restricted-land figures.