Skip to content

Adelaide · Council

Norwood Payneham and St Peters

0 residential parcels covering 9.5 km².

Highly restricted land

≈92% of Norwood Payneham and St Peters’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Norwood Payneham and St Peters ranks #11 of 22 councils in Adelaide, and #38 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Norwood Payneham and St Peters. ABS LGA code 45290. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Norwood Payneham and St Peters ranks in Adelaide

Norwood Payneham and St Peters ranks #11 of 22 Adelaide-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Norwood Payneham and St Peters: ≈92% · rank #11 of 22

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Adelaide Plains≈100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Hills≈98%
  3. ⋯
  4. 10. Unley≈92%
  5. 11. Salisbury≈91%
  6. 12. Norwood Payneham and St Peters≈91%
  7. 13. Port Adelaide Enfield≈89%
  8. 14. Marion≈87%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Mount Barker≈69%
  11. 22. Adelaide≈33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Burnside≈90%
  2. 2. Mitcham≈90%
  3. ⋯
  4. 4. Prospect≈82%
  5. 5. Walkerville≈68%
  6. 6. Norwood Payneham and St Peters≈53%
  7. 7. Marion≈42%
  8. 8. West Torrens≈34%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Adelaide≈0%
  11. 22. Adelaide Plains≈0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Unley≈76%
  2. 2. Adelaide≈43%
  3. 3. Walkerville≈39%
  4. 4. Norwood Payneham and St Peters≈26%
  5. 5. Burnside≈17%
  6. 6. Gawler≈16%
  7. ⋯
  8. 21. Salisbury≈0%
  9. 22. Light≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Adelaide Hills≈100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Plains≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 9. Walkerville≈93%
  5. 10. Unley≈92%
  6. 11. Norwood Payneham and St Peters≈92%
  7. 12. Salisbury≈92%
  8. 13. Port Adelaide Enfield≈91%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Playford≈70%
  11. 22. Adelaide≈44%

Source: Norwood Payneham and St Peters ranked against other Adelaide-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Norwood Payneham and St Peters

6 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Norwood Payneham and St Peters.

  1. St Peters (SA)≈100%
  2. Felixstow≈95%
  3. Payneham≈86%
  4. Norwood (SA)≈85%
  5. Marden≈84%
  6. Glynde≈80%
Per page:

All suburbs →

Adelaide context

Norwood Payneham and St Peters ranks #11 of 22 councils in Adelaide for highly restricted residential land.

  1. Adelaide Hills ≈100%
  2. Adelaide Plains ≈100%
  3. Burnside ≈98%
  4. Mitcham ≈98%
  5. Charles Sturt ≈95%
  6. Campbelltown (SA) ≈95%
  7. Holdfast Bay ≈94%
  8. Tea Tree Gully ≈94%
  9. Walkerville ≈93%
  10. Unley ≈92%
  11. Norwood Payneham and St Peters ≈92%
  12. Salisbury ≈92%
  13. Port Adelaide Enfield ≈91%
  14. Marion ≈87%
  15. Prospect ≈85%
  16. Onkaparinga ≈85%
  17. Gawler ≈83%
  18. West Torrens ≈82%
  19. Light ≈76%
  20. Mount Barker ≈72%
  21. Playford ≈70%
  22. Adelaide ≈44%
Per page:

All councils →

← Back to Adelaide