Skip to content

Adelaide · Council

Prospect

0 residential parcels covering 5.4 km².

Highly restricted land

≈85% of Prospect’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Prospect ranks #16 of 22 councils in Adelaide, and #66 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Prospect. ABS LGA code 46510. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Prospect ranks in Adelaide

Prospect ranks #16 of 22 Adelaide-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Prospect: ≈85% · rank #16 of 22

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Adelaide Plains≈100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Hills≈98%
  3. ⋯
  4. 14. Marion≈87%
  5. 15. Onkaparinga≈86%
  6. 16. Prospect≈85%
  7. 17. Gawler≈83%
  8. 18. West Torrens≈81%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Playford≈67%
  11. 22. Adelaide≈33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Burnside≈90%
  2. 2. Mitcham≈90%
  3. 3. Unley≈83%
  4. 4. Prospect≈82%
  5. 5. Walkerville≈68%
  6. 6. Norwood Payneham and St Peters≈53%
  7. ⋯
  8. 21. Adelaide≈0%
  9. 22. Adelaide Plains≈0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Unley≈76%
  2. 2. Adelaide≈43%
  3. ⋯
  4. 5. Burnside≈17%
  5. 6. Gawler≈16%
  6. 7. Prospect≈13%
  7. 8. Charles Sturt≈12%
  8. 9. Mount Barker≈9%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Salisbury≈0%
  11. 22. Light≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Adelaide Hills≈100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Plains≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 14. Marion≈87%
  5. 15. Onkaparinga≈86%
  6. 16. Prospect≈85%
  7. 17. Gawler≈83%
  8. 18. West Torrens≈81%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Playford≈67%
  11. 22. Adelaide≈44%

Source: Prospect ranked against other Adelaide-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Prospect

3 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Prospect.

  1. Broadview≈98%
  2. Nailsworth≈89%
  3. Prospect (SA)≈81%
Per page:

All suburbs →

Adelaide context

Prospect ranks #16 of 22 councils in Adelaide for highly restricted residential land.

  1. Adelaide Hills ≈100%
  2. Adelaide Plains ≈100%
  3. Burnside ≈98%
  4. Mitcham ≈98%
  5. Campbelltown (SA) ≈96%
  6. Holdfast Bay ≈95%
  7. Charles Sturt ≈94%
  8. Tea Tree Gully ≈94%
  9. Walkerville ≈93%
  10. Unley ≈92%
  11. Norwood Payneham and St Peters ≈92%
  12. Salisbury ≈92%
  13. Port Adelaide Enfield ≈92%
  14. Marion ≈87%
  15. Onkaparinga ≈86%
  16. Prospect ≈85%
  17. Gawler ≈83%
  18. West Torrens ≈81%
  19. Light ≈76%
  20. Mount Barker ≈73%
  21. Playford ≈67%
  22. Adelaide ≈44%
Per page:

All councils →

Detailed zoning map

Prospect’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon

Every residential zone in Prospect

  1. Established NeighbourhoodEN5 km²81.4%
  2. Housing Diversity NeighbourhoodHDN<1 km²2.4%
  3. General NeighbourhoodGN<1 km²0.1%
  4. Suburban Activity CentreSAC<1 km²1.8%
  5. Urban Corridor (Boulevard)UC(Bo)<1 km²6.1%
  6. Urban Corridor (Business)UC(Bu)<1 km²3.8%
  7. Urban Corridor (Living)UC(L)<1 km²3.4%
  8. Urban Corridor (Main Street)UC(MS)<1 km²1.0%
Per page:

Source: State-published zoning data, residential ex-rural, bounded to the Significant Urban Area. Areas measure the zone polygons drawn here, which include road reserve and unsubdivided land, so they are a different measure from the lot-by-lot areas behind this page’s restricted-land figures.

← Back to Adelaide