Skip to content

Adelaide · Council

Prospect

0 residential parcels covering 5.4 km².

Highly restricted land

85% of Prospect’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Prospect ranks #15 of 22 councils in Adelaide, and #66 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Prospect. ABS LGA code 46510. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Prospect ranks in Adelaide

Prospect ranks #15 of 22 Adelaide-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Prospect: 85% · rank #15 of 22

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Adelaide Plains100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Hills98%
  3. 13. Port Adelaide Enfield89%
  4. 14. Marion87%
  5. 15. Prospect85%
  6. 16. Onkaparinga84%
  7. 17. West Torrens81%
  8. 21. Mount Barker69%
  9. 22. Adelaide33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Burnside90%
  2. 2. Mitcham90%
  3. 3. Unley83%
  4. 4. Prospect82%
  5. 5. Walkerville68%
  6. 6. Norwood Payneham and St Peters53%
  7. 21. Adelaide0%
  8. 22. Adelaide Plains0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Unley76%
  2. 2. Adelaide43%
  3. 5. Burnside17%
  4. 6. Gawler16%
  5. 7. Prospect13%
  6. 8. Charles Sturt12%
  7. 9. Mount Barker9%
  8. 21. Salisbury0%
  9. 22. Light0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Adelaide Hills100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Plains100%
  3. 13. Port Adelaide Enfield91%
  4. 14. Marion87%
  5. 15. Prospect85%
  6. 16. Onkaparinga85%
  7. 17. Gawler83%
  8. 21. Playford70%
  9. 22. Adelaide44%

Source: Prospect ranked against other Adelaide-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Prospect

3 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Prospect.

Per page:

All suburbs →