Skip to content

Adelaide · Council

Salisbury

0 residential parcels covering 34.9 km².

Highly restricted land

92% of Salisbury’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Salisbury ranks #12 of 22 councils in Adelaide, and #40 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Salisbury. ABS LGA code 47140. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Salisbury ranks in Adelaide

Salisbury ranks #12 of 22 Adelaide-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Salisbury: 92% · rank #12 of 22

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Adelaide Plains100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Hills98%
  3. 9. Holdfast Bay92%
  4. 10. Unley92%
  5. 11. Salisbury91%
  6. 12. Norwood Payneham and St Peters91%
  7. 13. Port Adelaide Enfield89%
  8. 21. Mount Barker69%
  9. 22. Adelaide33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Burnside90%
  2. 2. Mitcham90%
  3. 16. Port Adelaide Enfield10%
  4. 17. Campbelltown (SA)9%
  5. 18. Salisbury6%
  6. 19. Tea Tree Gully4%
  7. 20. Mount Barker0%
  8. 21. Adelaide0%
  9. 22. Adelaide Plains0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Unley76%
  2. 2. Adelaide43%
  3. 19. Playford0%
  4. 20. Adelaide Plains0%
  5. 21. Salisbury0%
  6. 22. Light0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Adelaide Hills100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Plains100%
  3. 10. Unley92%
  4. 11. Norwood Payneham and St Peters92%
  5. 12. Salisbury92%
  6. 13. Port Adelaide Enfield91%
  7. 14. Marion87%
  8. 21. Playford70%
  9. 22. Adelaide44%

Source: Salisbury ranked against other Adelaide-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →