Skip to content

Adelaide · Council

Charles Sturt

0 residential parcels covering 29.0 km².

Highly restricted land

95% of Charles Sturt’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Charles Sturt ranks #5 of 22 councils in Adelaide, and #23 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Charles Sturt. ABS LGA code 41060. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Charles Sturt ranks in Adelaide

Charles Sturt ranks #5 of 22 Adelaide-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Charles Sturt: 95% · rank #5 of 22

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Adelaide Plains100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Hills98%
  3. 4. Mitcham97%
  4. 5. Campbelltown (SA)95%
  5. 6. Charles Sturt94%
  6. 7. Tea Tree Gully94%
  7. 8. Walkerville93%
  8. 21. Mount Barker69%
  9. 22. Adelaide33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Burnside90%
  2. 2. Mitcham90%
  3. 8. West Torrens34%
  4. 9. Holdfast Bay25%
  5. 10. Charles Sturt25%
  6. 11. Gawler21%
  7. 12. Onkaparinga18%
  8. 21. Adelaide0%
  9. 22. Adelaide Plains0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Unley76%
  2. 2. Adelaide43%
  3. 6. Gawler16%
  4. 7. Prospect13%
  5. 8. Charles Sturt12%
  6. 9. Mount Barker9%
  7. 10. Holdfast Bay9%
  8. 21. Salisbury0%
  9. 22. Light0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Adelaide Hills100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Plains100%
  3. 3. Burnside98%
  4. 4. Mitcham98%
  5. 5. Charles Sturt95%
  6. 6. Campbelltown (SA)95%
  7. 7. Holdfast Bay94%
  8. 21. Playford70%
  9. 22. Adelaide44%

Source: Charles Sturt ranked against other Adelaide-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →