Skip to content

Adelaide · Council

Mount Barker

0 residential parcels covering 14.6 km².

Highly restricted land

≈73% of Mount Barker’s residential land is highly restricted.

Driven mostly by 2-storey height caps. Mount Barker ranks #20 of 22 councils in Adelaide, and #94 of 133 capital city councils nationally.

Highly restricted residential
Not highly restricted residential

Source: Geometric union of 2-storey, low-density, detached-only, and heritage controls across Mount Barker. ABS LGA code 44550. Methodology →

Note: Figures and the map cover only the parts of this area inside the capital’s Significant Urban Area; land beyond the SUA boundary is excluded from our modelling.

Where Mount Barker ranks in Adelaide

Mount Barker ranks #20 of 22 Adelaide-area councils for highly restricted residential land.

Highly restricted

Mount Barker: ≈73% · rank #20 of 22

0% (least restrictive)(most restrictive) 100%

2-storey cap

  1. 1. Adelaide Plains≈100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Hills≈98%
  3. ⋯
  4. 18. West Torrens≈81%
  5. 19. Light≈76%
  6. 20. Mount Barker≈72%
  7. 21. Playford≈67%
  8. 22. Adelaide≈33%

Low-density

  1. 1. Burnside≈90%
  2. 2. Mitcham≈90%
  3. ⋯
  4. 18. Salisbury≈6%
  5. 19. Tea Tree Gully≈4%
  6. 20. Mount Barker≈0%
  7. 21. Adelaide≈0%
  8. 22. Adelaide Plains≈0%

Heritage

  1. 1. Unley≈76%
  2. 2. Adelaide≈43%
  3. ⋯
  4. 7. Prospect≈13%
  5. 8. Charles Sturt≈12%
  6. 9. Mount Barker≈9%
  7. 10. Holdfast Bay≈9%
  8. 11. Adelaide Hills≈7%
  9. ⋯
  10. 21. Salisbury≈0%
  11. 22. Light≈0%

Highly restricted

  1. 1. Adelaide Hills≈100%
  2. 2. Adelaide Plains≈100%
  3. ⋯
  4. 18. West Torrens≈81%
  5. 19. Light≈76%
  6. 20. Mount Barker≈73%
  7. 21. Playford≈67%
  8. 22. Adelaide≈44%

Source: Mount Barker ranked against other Adelaide-area councils on each restriction metric (ex-rural shares). Methodology →

Suburbs in Mount Barker

4 suburbs sit inside this council.

ABS Suburb & Locality (SAL) boundaries that fall at least 30% inside Mount Barker.

  1. Hahndorf≈100%
  2. Littlehampton≈100%
  3. Nairne≈100%
  4. Mount Barker (SA)≈55%
Per page:

All suburbs →

Adelaide context

Mount Barker ranks #20 of 22 councils in Adelaide for highly restricted residential land.

  1. Adelaide Hills ≈100%
  2. Adelaide Plains ≈100%
  3. Burnside ≈98%
  4. Mitcham ≈98%
  5. Campbelltown (SA) ≈96%
  6. Holdfast Bay ≈95%
  7. Charles Sturt ≈94%
  8. Tea Tree Gully ≈94%
  9. Walkerville ≈93%
  10. Unley ≈92%
  11. Norwood Payneham and St Peters ≈92%
  12. Salisbury ≈92%
  13. Port Adelaide Enfield ≈92%
  14. Marion ≈87%
  15. Onkaparinga ≈86%
  16. Prospect ≈85%
  17. Gawler ≈83%
  18. West Torrens ≈81%
  19. Light ≈76%
  20. Mount Barker ≈73%
  21. Playford ≈67%
  22. Adelaide ≈44%
Per page:

All councils →

Detailed zoning map

Mount Barker’s residential planning controls, polygon-by-polygon

Every residential zone in Mount Barker

  1. Established NeighbourhoodEN<1 km²0.2%
  2. Housing Diversity NeighbourhoodHDN1 km²5.9%
  3. NeighbourhoodN8 km²36.9%
  4. Suburban NeighbourhoodSN<1 km²<0.1%
  5. TownshipT<1 km²0.2%
  6. Township Main StreetTMS<1 km²1.9%
  7. Township NeighbourhoodTN1 km²6.1%
  8. Master Planned NeighbourhoodMPN10 km²46.4%
  9. Local Activity CentreLAC<1 km²0.4%
  10. Suburban Activity CentreSAC<1 km²0.2%
  11. Suburban Main StreetSMS<1 km²0.2%
  12. Urban Activity CentreUAC<1 km²1.3%
  13. Suburban BusinessSB<1 km²<0.1%
  14. Urban NeighbourhoodUN<1 km²0.3%
Per page:

Source: State-published zoning data, residential ex-rural, bounded to the Significant Urban Area. Areas measure the zone polygons drawn here, which include road reserve and unsubdivided land, so they are a different measure from the lot-by-lot areas behind this page’s restricted-land figures.

← Back to Adelaide